Many cities are now turning parks and farmland into new housing developments. Is this a positive or negative development?

Some are of the belief that current initiatives to transform public parks and farms into residential areas are misguided. I am in general agreement with
this
contention despite its ostensible advantages in dense urban regions. Those who argue
this
policy is positive point out its effects on overcrowding in
cities
. In the
last
century, mass migrations to
cities
have created increasingly dense urban regions. One of the best solutions for
this
is to expand the size of
cities
by subsuming nearby farmlands into urban districts.
For instance
, large metropolitan areas
such
as Tokyo and Mexico City are only able to house their surging populations by spreading to neighbouring lands. The result is that more individuals are able to live in
cities
and enjoy higher standards of living, better healthcare, improved economic opportunity and various entertainment options. For the average resident,
such
development is incontestably positive.
However
, new housing developments neglect the primacy of the natural world.
Firstly
, building homes on nearby farmland not only clears away pristine natural land but
also
necessitates the transportation of agricultural products from greater distances.
This
will in turn exacerbate environmental issues and potentially lead to inflated food costs for the average person. More importantly,
cities
that lack parks are not providing an optimal living environment for residents. For wealthy individuals,
this
is less pressing since they may be able to make frequent trips to outlying areas. Whereas, for the least privileged classes, parks may be their only opportunities to experience nature and a life deprived of all contact with the natural world is undeniably bleak. In conclusion, despite the positives related to population density in
cities
, it is an overall negative due to its effect on the natural environment and quality of life in
cities
.
Such
proposals should
therefore
be pursued in moderation.
Submitted by mia01282 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: