Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Developed
countries
have been providing financial
aid
to
third
world
countries
for decades, but
this
has not changed the economic plight of poorer
countries
. I totally agree that the
aid
should be replaced b y other more effective forms of support, because of problems of corruption and poor economic management in these
countries
. The primary reason why financial
aid
is ineffective in easing poverty in recipient
countries
is
Replace the word
that
show examples
because
Add the preposition
ofbecause
show examples
the level of corruption in poorer
countries
. The majority of the fund is misappropriated by officials before it trickles down to the people. As the leaders in these areas are not democratically elected and have a strong grip
in
Change preposition
on
show examples
power, there is little leverage from the people to bring about change. To illustrate
this
, we can take a look at African
countries
, which have constantly received financial support from Western
countries
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
but remains undeveloped and financially inadequate. Another reason why funding is not effective is that the recipient government does not have sound economic policies and good governance in place.
This
means that these governments are not capable of managing the funds properly and the
aid
will be lost or misused.
Therefore
, ensuring governments are able to manage funds before the money is provided is crucial for positive outcomes from
this
financial
aid
. In conclusion, I reiterate my strong view that other types of support other than money are necessary because financial
aid
is often misused by recipient
countries
due to corruption and financial mismanagement.
Thus
, I recommend long term strategies to be put in place to ensure financial
aid
can be phased out.
Submitted by ichtsang on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • poverty alleviation
  • economic inequality
  • developing nations
  • foreign aid
  • sustainable growth
  • technical assistance
  • expertise
  • infrastructure
  • education
  • fair trade
  • trade barriers
  • sustainable development
  • environmental conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: