Exams are the best way of assessing a student’s level. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are no exact methods of assessing

one

's skills.

Exams

may be considered

one

of the procedures to evaluate students' calibre but it must not be the only way to categorise them. I partially agree with

this

statement. In a formal situation,

exams

become more popular throughout the world to judge any student and his or her level of knowledge. Teachers, as well as institutions,are highly organised to take

exams

so that they can evaluate their pupils for the

next

steps. It is a well-established system among schools, colleges and universities as well. By scoring the highest,

one

is ranked topper.

For example

, in job markets

exams

are a must to go to the

next

round in most cases. They sort out employees through the marks they achieve.

Besides

exams

, there are a lot of ways of judging the level of a student. It may be an oral presentation, communication skills, group meetings, group discussion etc. These technics are very helpful to make a conclusion about a candidate. Sometimes these systems are more accurate than

exams

. In

this

modern era, some giant companies and universities are trying to grasp these methods to cope with situations.

Such

as, many recruitment agencies nowadays mainly focus on the co and extra curriculum activities of a person rather than the grades they acquire. How they talk, how they walk or how they manage a critical situation is a very important criterion rather than taking

exams

. In a nutshell,

exams

are obviously the fundamental criteria to assess someone but it is

also

important to monitor other than

exams

. The

first

exam

then

viva-voce may be an effective strategy to evaluate both

one

's proficiency and skills.