should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth with poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? or is the responsability of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Accordingly
Linking Words
to some schools of thought, strong economies ought to supply unwealthy
countries
Use synonyms
with aid, supporting them with the realization of primary and essential services
such
Linking Words
as food and educational programs.
However
Linking Words
, others believe prosperous states should not commit themselves to any intervention, leaving
this
Linking Words
duty to the country's local governors.
Although
Linking Words
several arguments are supporting both the hypothesis, I personally agree with the idea that puts a moral obligation of action upon the richest
countries
Use synonyms
in the world.
Firstly
Linking Words
, because often a discrete amount of the wealth of a nation derives from previous exploitations in damage to poorer
countries
Use synonyms
. In fact, thinking about democracies
such
Linking Words
as Holland or Belgium, no one could forget to mention their colonialist experience. Taking advantage respectively of South Africa's diamond mines and Congo's ivory, both the European states strengthened their economies. Beyond these examples, it is clear that we should consider a country's prosperity as the counterpart of steady exploitation.
Therefore
Linking Words
, wealthier nations should give back what they improperly appropriated.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, I strongly agree with those who believe that providing free essential services to
third
Linking Words
-world
countries
Use synonyms
would be a benefit for the whole economy. Supporting development among these populations surely needs huge investments at
first
Linking Words
, but
this
Linking Words
effort will definitely be worthwhile.
For example
Linking Words
, ensuring better living conditions will enlarge the economic market, as people will start to spend their salaries
instead
Linking Words
of saving them. In conclusion, even if it may appear a waste of money, wealthy democracies should doubtless provide aid to unwealthy ones, both for moral and economic reasons.
Submitted by matpic00 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: