The maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of compute technology that has similar functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

These days, modern

technology

play the important role in receiving knowledge and information similar to central libraries.

Therefore

, some

people

feel that the

library

is not necessary anymore, and the authority should not invest a budget to renovate it, while others argue that it is still indispensable of its advantages, which cannot be replaced by computers. In

this

essay, the reason support why libraries should still exist will be elaborated on.

First

of all, the

library

is not only the

place

where

people

are able to read

books

and search for information, but it's

also

the

place

where

people

who love reading gather.

Therefore

, the reader can make new friends who have similar passions.

For example

, when I was a master's degree student, I always went to the

library

and I found the girl that I fall in love with.

As a result

, right now she is my soulmate. The

library

is more than a book store, it is a

place

where you can meet new

people

who love the same things.

Furthermore

,

Library

enables

people

to search for rare information or old

books

, which cannot be found on the internet or any modern

technology

as it has been the

place

to preserve the various types of

books

for many decades. To illustrate, the historical story of King Rama the

first

of Thailand cannot be read on the internet because nobody uploads it and it is valuable to the nation, which cannot be published widely.

This

is why the government need to spend the budget to conserve the national treasure. In conclusion,

although

the advancement of

technology

can offer a new way of reading, it cannot subsidize the advantages of the

library

including gathering places, and sources of ancient

books

. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement and believe that the

library

will exist no matter the development of

technology

.