Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is believed that government should have an allocation of their budget to railways rather than

roads

. I completely disagree with

this

notion because most developing

countries

are dominated by road-based vehicles and

roads

are more universal and wide purpose when compared with rails. In a developing country, infrastructure like

roads

is necessary because most citizens have a road-based vehicle for their daily transportation and work.

This

phenomenon

also

causes some problems like congestion which impact the economy.

For instance

, in Jakarta which is the capital city of Indonesia,

this

issue causes money losses because many

people

get stuck in traffic jams and

also

spent a large number of fuel which needs to be fixed with the refinement of

roads

.

As a result

, the improvement of road infrastructure will give a lot of benefits for individual

people

and the business sector.

On the other hand

,

roads

are cheaper to build than rails and

also

have a wide purpose in developing

countries

. It is because

people

can use that facility with wider utilities and most vehicles can use it,

such

as private vehicles, buses, and trucks. With wider use purposes, it can improve

people

's satisfaction and support small-medium enterprises.

Thus

, giving allocation to

this

sector is a wise decision in reason of most

people

need it. In conclusion,

roads

are more important in developing nations because the citizens of these

countries

do not have good public transportation facilities compared to developed

countries

.

Thus

, improving road infrastructure will give benefits like economic improvements, logistics, and personal uses.