Some systems require students to specialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen. Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of these two education systems and which is better?

The requirements of some

school

systems want the

students

to succeed in classes by a limited

range

before they are 15, But other systems require the

students

to get a wide

range

of studies until they graduate. The

students

will get the benefits from the

school

that want the

children

to get a wide

range

of courses.

To begin

with, The student will get to understand what they like to do and they could see the path to their future career.

For example

, in a

school

that did not focus on academic skills, the

students

will have more opportunities to experience new subjects that are fit for the

students

.

Furthermore

, it will release the stress from the

children

, because the

children

will get to participate in

school

activities more than the

school

that wants the

children

to specialize in academic subjects.

Moreover

, There are a lot of things that the

school

did not teach the undergraduates, but the

school

that guides the

students

to find their path through the activities in

school

is the

school

that really understands the

students

the most.

For example

, schools create a music band contest. The

school

will see the skill of the

students

that are participating in

this

event,

also

the teachers could help those talented

children

to be a musician by posting a video on social media or something to get viral. In conclusion, I believe that a

school

that focuses on a wide

range

of subject will give more benefits than a

school

that are focused on academic skills.

In addition

, there are more careers to do than in the past decades

Add the comma(s)

, therefore,

show examples

therefore

schools should give an opportunity for

students

to show their skills.