The government’s investment in the arts, music, and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. Do you agree with the statement?

It is often argued that spending government money on the arts, music, and

theatre

is just a waste of cash and that these funds should be invested in social

services

. I completely disagree with

this

opinion and think that investing in the arts, music, and

theatre

is much more important than public

services

.

First

of all, I believe that

art

gives people an idea of culture that no public service can guarantee.

In other words

, public

services

will not improve our sense of

art

, which is extremely vital for the development of culture and the notion of ancestors’ tradition.

For example

, a lot of historical events have been identified thanks to

art

, and it has

also

helped to learn about ancestors’ lifestyles. That’s why, it is more important to invest in

art

, music, and

theatre

to show modern society to the

next

generation.

Secondly

, the arts foster physical, mental, and emotional health.

Therefore

, investing in the

art

will be a reliable doctor.

This

is because

art

therapy is a medically and economically effective tool for treating

aging

Change the spelling

ageing

show examples

adults, children, and people suffering from trauma.

For instance

, while a person sees

theatre

, artwork, or listens to songs, they can get a healthy dose of pleasure. And after seeing that, a good mood will follow you throughout the day.

Thus

, the advantages of investing in

art

outweigh its drawbacks, and there is no need to invest these funds in public

services

. To conclude, I strongly believe that investing cash in

art

is more beneficial than investing cash in public

services

because it makes people aware of

history

Add an article

the history

show examples

and healthy.