Some people advocate that the parks and gardens need to be replaced with apartments so the public to easily commute between work and home, whereas others disagree with
this
topic. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss both views on the given topic.
Linking Words
Firstly
, it is a great idea to have a workplace located right near the city centre as it reduces a lot of time being spent travelling alone. It Linking Words
also
would save money and reduce pollution caused by the transport used for Linking Words
this
activity on a daily routine. Linking Words
For example
, research conducted by the University of California states that humans who spent less time commuting to the office, are highly productive compared to the ones who take a long route to reach the destined workplace. Linking Words
This
clearly indicates it is easy for the population involved if all essential services are located nearby.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, destroying parks and gardens for Linking Words
this
initiative will lead to global warming. Clearing these natural bodies in the city centre will increase the temperature as there are no trees or plants to absorb the carbon dioxide. Linking Words
For instance
, one of the research units from WHO states that locality which has less number of trees and plants tend to be hot and have water scarcity. Linking Words
In addition
, kids and older people need these places to walk and play with their friends and family.
To conclude, it is a good initiative as it will help the public to travel less but it should not cost any climatic change on the planet. I believe it is not essential to replace the gardens and parks just to make make it easy for the population to commute.Linking Words
kimakila98