Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, an increasing number of
people
are concerned about who is the best person to talk to about the harms of
crime
for
adolescents
. Some prisoners have been rehabilitated after being discharged from prison and become good citizens. My view is that these
people
educating
adolescents
is a good method.
First
, it is true that these reformed
criminals
can share experiences and it is more likely for teenagers to accept
this
advice.
For example
, reformed
criminals
can talk about the
crime
that they were involved in and the process of
crime
.
Also
when they talked about their life after they had a
crime
it will make teenagers afraid to commit a
crime
and eliminate any idea of criminal life.
On the other hand
. It is
also
true that other
people
can be good educators for
adolescents
but compared to reformed
criminals
is less effective.
For instance
, police go to the school and gave a speech about the result of the
crime
but
students
may not accept the authority's suggestions.Of course, teachers speak the
crime
information to their
students
and show some videos on the internet. These things for
students
only superficial understanding, cannot leave a deep impression. The best choice for
students
to learn about
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
crime
is to make face-to-face communication with reformed
criminals
who have real experience. In summary, it is believed that the person who is released from prison becomes a good citizen is
a
Change the article
the
show examples
best image to educate
adolescents
. Meanwhile, other
people
can
also
talk with teenagers about
crime
but just not as efficient as those
people
. By doing so we can make sure that our society will be more harmonious. .
Submitted by 121110595 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • prisoners
  • rehabilitation
  • recidivism
  • consequences
  • insights
  • deterrent
  • guidance
  • support
  • role models
  • positive change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: