Some people think that spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A few communities feel speaking is more dominating than writing skills. In

this

essay, I will give reasons and examples for why I disagree with the statement.

Firstly

, I will explore the advantages of written

communication

and

further

, I will discuss

people

's opinions on spoken

communication

.

To begin

with, writing is considered the most convenient mode to express ourselves because it holds law and conveys messages professionally.

In addition

,

people

feel safer writing any form of confidential information for future references.

For example

, we have all our job offers on a paper which holds true in terms of legal so it builds trust and authorises powers to the

people

.

Moreover

, students are qualified as graduates by assessing their thesis which is recorded on papers.

For instance

, many educational institutions conduct exams, and after passing the tests aspirants are awarded a degree.

On the other hand

, many societies condemn that speaking is a powerful tool though it is a formal way of

communication

but does not give promises firmly and lacks truth.

For example

, politicians address their community by talking about issues and promising to fulfil them in near future but that future does not come in life.

Further

, tounge can twist anyhow depending on our mood so it leads to conflicts and arguments, where miscommunication takes place.

For Instance

,

people

get into a fight by just not being clear in their speech and end up hurting each other. In conclusion, the world is bounded by many agreements and signs where writing plays a vital role in due diligence. In my opinion, the public must trust more paper rather than spoken

communication

.