Team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are played alone. Do you agree or disagree?

It will be better for a nation to play in teams rather than alone, as company activities can develop more essential skills for real life. I partly agree with

this

statement and in

this

,

essay

Add an article

an essay

the essay

show examples

I will outline both sides of

this

discussion. On the one hand, team movement is more useful. society improves vital skills for the life

such

as communication, critical thinking and more.

Also

, when a lot of people take part in one particular competition, crowds tend to get a competitor sense.

This

sense may impact their later and the population will put maximum force to achieve the most.

Secondly

, squad activities are more relaxed, as a lot of folks try their best to complete the exercise.

For instance

, almost every start-up was created by several communities as it was so hard to develop by one person.

On the other hand

, there are some advantages to being active alone as well. a nation that had the experience alone tends to be more powerful in terms of mental health.

Also

, he will not be upset when he again turns into a single person. While, after the

team

Add a comma

,team

show examples

action humans will be able to adapt to being single.

Secondly

, being alone in enterprise help crowds feel the highest responsibility in a particular area.

For instance

, a lot of ancient rulers were alone in every part of their life before they became rulers.

In addition

to it, after a single exercise, a person will adapt to group movement, easily. In conclusion, there are positive and negative sides. People should perfectly stay in a group,

,

Change the punctuation

apply

show examples

however

Add a comma

,however

show examples

they must feel convenient when they are alone.