There is a growing belief that smoking in cafes and airports must be banned by local authorities regardless of whether some smokers will have limited freedoms. I completely agree with
this
statement because smoking can affect other people in a bad way. Linking Words
This
essay will elaborate on why I advocate for Linking Words
this
opinion.
Linking Words
Initially
, when a person smokes in a public area, Linking Words
this
can be detrimental to the surrounding folks. To clarify, the Linking Words
smoke
gets in their lungs, Use synonyms
Thus
, these innocent men will have breathing issues, which can cause severe medical problems for them. Linking Words
In addition
, it can be tremendously appalling for smokers themselves. Linking Words
For example
, Linking Words
according to
many doctors at London Hospital, they said that 76% of lung cancer cases were because of inhaling Linking Words
smoke
in cafes.
Use synonyms
Furthermore
, every government should look after its nation. Linking Words
In other words
, when decision-makers see that smoking affects humans badly, they should take action regardless of any other aspect Linking Words
such
as limiting freedom. The priority goes for the citizens in general because saving their lives is more essential than restricting males who Linking Words
smoke
with some rules. Use synonyms
For instance
, In Japan, smokers were told to not Linking Words
smoke
in malls. Use synonyms
Hence
, the vast majority of people were happy because of Linking Words
this
role, and thatLinking Words
a
valid reason why it should be not allowed.
Add a missing verb
is a
To sum up
, I endorse Linking Words
this
perspective. Linking Words
Moreover
, smoking publicly has been playing a pivotal role in causing heart problems for others. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is crucial for presidents to stop Linking Words
this
negative trend.Linking Words
abdullahalraddadi1