Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the benefit and improvement of any given entail some unpaid

community

service

which can be done voluntarily or mandatorily. Regarding

this

matter, some individuals think that doing

such

activities ought to be an obligatory part of the

second

school

programmes. In the following, I am going to describe the aforementioned matter in detail and give my own verdict on it. I completely agree with

this

notion that unpaid philanthropic acts must be a compulsory section of teenagers’

school

materials inasmuch as

this

deed has at least two major benefits for youngsters: future job benefits and improving the sense of sympathy. Concerning the

first

-mentioned advantage, it can be beneficial for their career prospects in that

for example

, participating in unpaid

community

service

can provide a chance for high

school

pupils to improve skills important for a workplace like communication and organization skills, teamwork and so forth.

On the other hand

, taking part in

community

service

operations

such

as blood driving and donating or raising money for a local charity not only does empower the sense of co-operating with others but

also

raises the sympathy feeling with disabled or poor people.

Therefore

, the more voluntary or mandatory actions are done for any given

community

by teenagers, the more will be beneficial effects for both youngsters and the domestic

community

. In conclusion, I fully agreed with the existence of some unpaid

community

service

in high

school

pupils’ curricula now that these philanthropic operations can be helpful both for the young student and the

community

, especially the weak ones.