In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as mars. What extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that in the future, it will be very challenging to stay on
earth
due to human activities
such
as increased population and pollution, while some
people
claim that more
money
should be invested in researching other planets to live on,
such
as Mars. I strongly disagree with
this
statement and
therefore
, I think that funding for research should be spent on
earth
problems
like environmental damages
instead
of spending
this
money
on researching space. On the one hand, there are many reasons why in the future, it seems it will be more challenging for
people
to live in
this
world
.
First
and foremost, human activities
such
as an increase in population.
In other words
, the
world
population is increasing more rapidly compared to the past, and for that reason,
people
are suffering from housing and working
problems
. So, some countries are working on other planets like Mars to make them appropriate for
people
to live in, in case the
earth
fails to accommodate
people
’s needs.
For example
, in a recent survey by Harvard
University
Add a comma
,University
show examples
it can be seen that in Chicago province in the USA some
people
are suffering from housing
problems
due to environmental damages.
Secondly
, more private and public vehicles are increasing in trend,
as a result
, they release toxic gases which are harmful to human life and
also
one reason for global warming.
Furthermore
, every country has its own responsibility to take some major actions on
earth
problems
, which help them to keep their public in a safe environment. Developing countries' governments should spend more
money
on solving
earth
'searth
problems
instead
of investing in space research.
Moreover
, if governments spend their
money
on making electronic vehicles, it might be helpful to reduce the pollution rate, which is now a major problem for
this
world
.
For example
, during the 2019 corona
pandemic
Add a comma
,pandemic
show examples
almost the whole
world
stayed inside the house,
as a result
, pollution decreased over the period.
Also
Add a comma
,Also
show examples
government should spend
money
on researching environmental damages which are faced by many countries and, the authority should release strict laws against human activities that harm the environment. In conclusion, after considering all, human activity damaging the environment will create a difficult situation for
people
to live in the future
earth
.
However
, I think that investing
money
by the government in environmental
problems
will be helpful to preserve the
earth
for
people
to live
instead
of spending
money
on space research.
Submitted by alamskarbaz829 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: