many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charginig poeple for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Despite some museums

are

Wrong verb form

being

show examples

free,a plethora of them have prices for their entrance.

Although

charging for admissions has many benefits, the drawbacks involved are important to be scrutinized. On the plus side, it may appear that charging proves beneficial.The

first

axiomatic reason is concerned with providing facilities.Simply put, when they set a payment they endeavour to use

this

money to construct more fascinating and entertaining sections of the museum for the public.

This

in turn paves the way for people to be willing to attend these places.Take the Art Museum of Italy as an example; because of its fees, every year not only becomes more attractive but

also

officials add more beautiful extensions to the gallery.

Furthermore

, employability for individuals who are interested in

this

science would be extended.The other museums in spite of having free admission in terms of visiting not exciting. Having said that,

however

, the downsides of receiving money should not be underestimated.

To begin

with, reducing the number of visitors due to visiting fees counts as a direct result.

For example

, the Saad Abad Museum,which is a feat,has fewer than average visitors owing to the high cost of money for entrance.Another disadvantage is that all walks of people cannot use them in terms of either a hobby or scientific aspects.Free sites are more accessible for these fields and entitled each individual to use galleries. On balance,the tendency of pricing for gates would be both rewarding and problematic.In my opinion

Add a comma

,

show examples

charging takes priority. While more facilities and employability are established, museums are highly likely to have fewer visitors.