Some people argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some individuals firmly believe that young people cannot play a vital role in the administration,

whereas

Linking Words

others think they are indispensable in the crucial positions of the judiciary system. Personally, both attitudes are understandable. I am going to discuss these two views and elaborate on my own perspectives in the following paragraphs. On one hand, several governments would not appoint the youth in pivotal positions for reasons.

For example

Linking Words

, younger people usually lack abundant experience so they do not know how to make a decision when necessary.

Accordingly

Linking Words

, it is hard for them to efficiently issue an order and lead the whole team to achieve the company's goals.

Hence

Linking Words

, it seems that the juniors are not appropriate to take up a major role in the administration.

However

Linking Words

, there are advantages for the younger people who hold a significant role in the company.

For instance

Linking Words

, owing to their capabilities the older staff may not have,

such

Linking Words

as utilizing technological devices to deal with anything in the workplace.

Additionally

Linking Words

, the juniors are

also

Linking Words

usually more aggressive than the seniors. The former are willing to try their utmost to devote themselves to the occupation.

Therefore

Linking Words

, if the youth are assigned to vital positions in the government, they are able to make the organization more dynamic, leading directly to social progress.

To sum up

Linking Words

, it is apparent that the juniors acting as a considerable post are more beneficial to the firm.

Although

Linking Words

they have a dearth of experiences, they naturally possess energetic characteristics.

Thus

Linking Words

, it is better to grant an opportunity for them to be a crucial post in the regime