It is better for children to grow up in the country side than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree?

Countries around the world developed rapidly, more families were able to move into the big cities. There was a better educational environment in the big

city

than in the

countryside

.

Therefore

, I partly agree with

this

statement and

this

essay will explain why. On the

first

hand, big cities are able to provide more opportunities for offspring to attend school, and offspring here are able to get a better environment in their studies. With the evidence from ,researches it was proved that there were lesser teachers in the

countryside

.

This

shows that scenery seminaries are not able to produce offspring with a proper education environment.

Secondly

, parents are able to make more profit and provide offspring with better quality of life dealing with the prosperity of the

city

. On the flip side, it might be possible for the

heir

in the big

city

to go astray since there are many lures in the big

city

.

For example

, money and drug are the two aspects that cause

heir

to decadence, it is admittedly there the

heir

who grow up in the

countryside

don't have to deal with

this

problem. To be precise, parents and teachers in the big

city

should pay more attention to the

heir

. In conclusion, the

heir

in the big

city

is able to get a better childhood compared to the

heir

who grows up in the

countryside

.

Therefore

, I partly agree that it is better for the

heir

to grow up in the

countryside

than in a big

city

.