It is often said that the governaments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that governments spend a lot of money on saving

wildlife

from extinction,

however

other more hauntings problems are there to be solved

first

. I completely disagree with

this

point of view, because

wildlife

is an important aspect of the

ecosystem

and authorities should protect

this

.

Firstly

wildlife

is a main important part of an

ecosystem

, and to sustain

this

, protection of natural habitats is required. So for the protection of endangered , species union should launch some projects in

this

field to increase awareness among the people to stop poaching animals and understand the value of protection of them in their life,

for

example

Add the comma(s)

,example

show examples

awareness through social media and arranging programs in various parts of the country.

In addition

, deforestation is most of the most dangerous situations to survive for

wildlife

. To stop

this

, or maintain balance in the food chain some necessary steps are required from the authority. Because a balanced food chain is crucial for arranging meals for the human population. If any deviation occurs in any step of the food cycle, it will impact the overall natural environment which increases the possibility of many unwanted problems,

for instance

frequently climate change, and the extinction of animals and plants. In conclusion, the balance of the

ecosystem

is very essential for all of us and to maintain

this

we should have to protect

wildlife

.

For

Change preposition

This

show examples

this

ministry should have to launch projects which will cost heavily but the

ecosystem

is more important than money. Government should take care of problems related to

wildlife

as well as other issues like poverty, unemployment and health-related issues.