Some people think young people should be required to have full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the significance of education is being widely recognised. Some people perceive that full-time education should be compulsory for adolescents who are under the age of 18. In

this

essay, I shall discuss why I completely agree with

this

proposition. There are various compelling reasons why teenagers should attend

school

on a full-time basis and the prominent one is that it enables students to cultivate a better habit of studying with the prolonged assistance and accompaniment of teachers and peers in

school

.

In addition

, staying in

school

for a long time can effectively prevent youngsters from being led astray by bad companions.

For instance

, a recent survey conducted in Japan has revealed that schools with stringent attendance rules have lower juvenile delinquency rates compared to others that are lenient with student attendance. As can be seen, these advantages have a profound impact on the development of the younger generation.

However

, every coin has two sides. One main adverse consequence of

this

notion is that students are prone to suffer from anxiety and stress

due to

the variety of restrictions in

school

.

As a result

, some children's mental wellness could be negatively affected by spending too much time in classes. Take me as an example, I used to go to a boarding

school

when I was a child and I felt stressed out and depressed

due to

a lack of private time.

Therefore

, teenagers' mental health could be adversely impacted by

this

.

To sum up

, people's opinions about whether we should mandate full-time education for underaged students are various. Taking everything into consideration, I strongly believe that

this

is an absolute imperative

that is

entirely justified despite the minor and occasional risks involved.