Many museums charge for admissions while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums overweight the disadvantages?

People should pay for

entrance

0f many

museums

, albeit others are without charge. In my opinion charge for admission to

museums

are necessary.

Museums

are important places, that have fundamental effects on introducing the culture and history of the society. so taking care of them are essential either.

Museums

have various futures that are costly which are collected from entrances paid to be run.

For example

, maintenance and renovating the arts, cleaning the exhibition, and providing guardians to inhibit robbery to protect the

museums

are costly.

Besides

, the

museum

should be always ready for unexpected events like firing. Managers should provide the expenses of fire alarms, fire extinguishers, and other types of equipment.

Also

, presenting the culture and history of a country to the world is the main goal of a

museum

which requires an advertising department to attract tourists. The advertisement needs investigation. All these expenditures should be provided from

entrance

pay

otherwise

the government, society, or privet cooperations should contribute

instead

.

However

, paying for

museum

entrance

has negative effects on the community too.

For instance

, visiting

museums

is one of the most joyful amusements for families, but

entrance

pay is not affordable for poor families.

This

disadvantage reduces the average historical knowledge of society. Notwithstanding I think

this

happening is solvable by providing free tickets for poor families and

also

tickets for foreigns should be more expensive than native people. In conclusion, I think the benefits of paying for

museum

entrance

overweight the disadvantages as they help run the

museums

constantly.

However

, if the government or other organizations solve the financial problems, the payment for

entrance

is not necessary.