Some people say that older people should live with their adult children, while others think they should live in homes specially built for old people. Which do you think is a better practice?

Nowadays, some children have to live far away from their parents,

as a result

Linking Words

, when their guardians become older and need somebody to preserve them, their offspring bring them to the homes which are designed for aged people,

on the contrary

Linking Words

others prefer to protecting them when need. There are two valid opinions on both sides,which I will consider in

this

Linking Words

essay. On one hand, it is agreed that children have some kind of duties including protecting their parents, due to their expectations.

For example

Linking Words

, they provide their home or visit them for a short-term period of time.

Also

Linking Words

, when aged people are retired, their sons and daughters save and send money for their requirements.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, most individuals when they are young move to other provinces or nations for some reasons,

such

Linking Words

as educational purposes or looking for a better job to get wealthy. Not to mention,

for instance

Linking Words

, when they built their lives there, as a consequence, it can be difficult to leave their town mostly.

Hence

Linking Words

, they can be fired when they leave their work. So, these communities should move their mother and fathers to homes for the aged, which are provided by the government. In conclusion, it is true that children are expected to protect their guardians, but some situations make

this

Linking Words

impossible;

however

Linking Words

, from my perspective, preserving parents should be done by their offspring.