The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Today, the Earth is facing a massive threat in the form of a climate crisis and it is believed by many that the most efficient way to tackle the world’s environmental issue is by augmenting fuel prices. Conservationists would deem
this
method to be effective and I agree with this
notion; however
, up to an extent, as it heavily impacts the livelihood of the poor society.
On the one hand, it is a potent solution to increase the rate of crude commodities like oil since that would force people to try alternative methods of transportation and in turn reduce their carbon emissions. Fostering the habit of cycling and carpooling for instance
could be the go-to method. The Netherlands is one such
country to have adopted the systemic approach by inflating the gas prices thereafter
urging the nation to take up cycling and subsequently
becoming a greener nation. Additionally
, it would also
discourage an individual from purchasing automobiles that run on petrol or diesel and encourage them to switch to electric vehicles.
On the other hand
, the obvious reason why a hike in fuel rates would not be a better solution for humanity is that it could worsen poverty. People with meagre incomes and daily wage earners would have a hard time saving their salary for their basic needs if their travelling expenses increase
. Wrong verb form
increased
Besides
, the fuel price determines the market prices of other essential commodities, and increasing the price can affect poor and middle-class families. If this
practice were to take place in India, for instance
, there would be a spike in the number of families struggling to afford food and household essentials.
In conclusion, increasing the price of petrol can certainly help reduce environmental pollution to some degree; however
, I feel that educating people about the ill effects of the overuse of natural resources and encouraging them to use alternative methods would be a better solution in handling this
issue as it will not further
deteriorate the life of the poor.Submitted by kamal.hosp.mang on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
extended
Task Response: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of increasing fuel prices to solve the environmental problem. It presents a well-organized viewpoint and provides relevant examples to support the argument. However, there could be more emphasis on providing a clear opinion in the introduction and conclusion.
extended
Coherence and Cohesion: The essay demonstrates a good use of paragraphing and transitional phrases to connect ideas, creating a logical flow of information. The introduction and conclusion adequately frame the essay's argument, and the main points are effectively supported with relevant examples. However, there is room for improvement in presenting a more distinct opinion in the introduction and conclusion.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!