Should arts-related entertainment venues such as museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge apply for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion.

Nowadays, considering the increasing enthusiasm of
people
toward artistic places, they can be addressed as effective locations for entertainment. Yet, there remains a contentious debate as to whether participating in these sites should be free for the population or not. I strongly agree with
this
topic and will support my perspective with more details and practical examples.
Firstly
, free entrance to these zones can lead to more education in civilization.
In addition
,
this
is an indisputable fact that the ability to visit these blueprints freely can be a beneficial element to encourage all parts of the country to involve more in art and history, particularly less affluent segments of a nation;
also
,
this
capability can make a more homogeneous
society
with higher societal cohesion between different levels of
society
since they can make better intellectual connections with each other.
For instance
, learning about art and history improves the appreciation of
people
for their citizens and homeland, which can be an effective way to increase both harmony and omit discrimination.
Consequently
, cost-free participation must be followed for these zones to attract more
people
to the concept of art and history resulting in societies with a more suitable living atmosphere.
On the other hand
, the maintenance cost of these areas is unbearable for the governments to propose free entrance for the public. Despite the positive impacts of these locations on
society
, it is nearly impossible for the country to cover all the preservation expenses, so there must be a fee, even a small amount, for the visitors to pay for the ticket. One particularly salient example is the cost of electricity in these widespread zones which is a detrimental burden for the country to manage, which can not be totally paid for by the financial incentives of the government and additional aid is needed for
this
issue; the role of visitors in paying a part of these costs can be influential.
Thus
, presenting free access to these artistic areas is not affordable for a nation based on the high expenses of maintaining these sites. As a way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that the role of art-based buildings in the improvement of
society
is an irrefutable concept , but it can not be met with free accessibility to these neighbourhoods considering their high expenses.
Also
, it is highly recommended to provide cognitive processes for
people
with
Add an article
the
show examples
lower financial strength to benefit from these regions.
Submitted by mortaza.ghamari on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: