Nowadays, considering the increasing enthusiasm of
people
toward artistic places, they can be addressed as effective locations for entertainment. Yet, there remains a contentious debate as to whether participating in these sites should be free for the population or not. I strongly agree with
this
topic and will support my perspective with more details and practical examples.
Firstly
, free entrance to these zones can lead to more education in civilization.
In addition
,
this
is an indisputable fact that the ability to visit these blueprints freely can be a beneficial element to encourage all parts of the country to involve more in art and history, particularly less affluent segments of a nation;
also
,
this
capability can make a more homogeneous
society
with higher societal cohesion between different levels of
society
since they can make better intellectual connections with each other.
For instance
, learning about art and history improves the appreciation of
people
for their citizens and homeland, which can be an effective way to increase both harmony and omit discrimination.
Consequently
, cost-free participation must be followed for these zones to attract more
people
to the concept of art and history resulting in societies with a more suitable living atmosphere.
On the other hand
, the maintenance cost of these areas is unbearable for the governments to propose free entrance for the public. Despite the positive impacts of these locations on
society
, it is nearly impossible for the country to cover all the preservation expenses, so there must be a fee, even a small amount, for the visitors to pay for the ticket. One particularly salient example is the cost of electricity in these widespread zones which is a detrimental burden for the country to manage, which can not be totally paid for by the financial incentives of the government and additional aid is needed for
this
issue; the role of visitors in paying a part of these costs can be influential.
Thus
, presenting free access to these artistic areas is not affordable for a nation based on the high expenses of maintaining these sites.
As a way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm that the role of art-based buildings in the improvement of
society
is an irrefutable concept , but it can not be met with free accessibility to these neighbourhoods considering their high expenses.
Also
, it is highly recommended to provide cognitive processes for
people
with
Add an article
show examples
lower financial strength to benefit from these regions.