Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and work of arts by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Nowadays, the improvement of technologies causes
people
's opinion toward public
museums
and art galleries will not be needed because they can see from social platforms through devices or gadgets. As far as I am concerned, I completely agree about the statement and
this
essay will discuss several advantages that can be given below.
First
of all, one of the
first
benefits of
this
situation is that
people
can learn or find information quickly through the internet without wasting their time to go public
museums
.
This
would mean that it is more effective and efficient as well for someone who wants to seek details about historical events and objects by using a computer.
In addition
, they would not need to take time to go to public
museums
in order to find information. An illustration of
this
view is that
people
who have a lot of assignments in their workplace are not able to have leisure time to visit
museums
. In
this
case, using devices can help
people
to look for some details on the internet about historical events with a touch of a button.
Secondly
, another benefit would be they do not have to spend their money on visiting art galleries because it required high prices on travel and ticket entry and many
people
who are from unprivileged backgrounds are not affordable to pay the requirements.
For instance
, one of my friends who live in Aceh is having difficulties visiting Jakarta which has many national
museums
because of the high fees for ticket transportation and the museum. To sum up, I strongly agree that technologies, today, have benefits for
people
in learning historical events.
As a result
, many communities will gain knowledge and become more nationalist.
Submitted by hendonhp27 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: