Prison is the common way most countries try to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide the public with a better education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that better

education

is a more efficient way to solve

crime

problem

Fix the agreement mistake

problems

show examples

than

prison

. I completely agree with

this

because of three reasons.

First

of all,

education

can solve the

crime

problem

fundamentally,

secondly

, it solves the

problem

before anyone gets hurt, and

lastly

, the way of the solving

problem

of

crime

with

education

is cheaper than

prison

. Indeed, much research shows that there is a negative correlation between

crime

rate and

education

level.

In other words

, as the

education

level and quality increase, the

crime

rate decreases. It means, from my point of view, if society can be adequately educated,

crime

can be completely wiped out, even if it seems impossible.

Moreover

, in

this

case, the

crime

would be prevented without anyone getting hurt.

This

is the most important reason why I believe

education

is a better solution than

prison

. Because

prison

, I think, is not a solution, it is just punishment; and unfortunately, some crimes,

such

as murder, cannot be compensated for by punishment.

Finally

, the cost of the

prison

method in countries is quite high. Prisons must be built, prisoners must be cared for, and many workers must be paid for it.

Furthermore

, the crimes which can be prevented with

education

incur extra costs. And all of these are paid by innocent citizens’ taxes. In conclusion, while

prison

is not a solution just a punishment method,

education

can solve the

problem

of

crime

and prevent people from getting hurt.

In addition

,

education

is cheaper than it.