Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that government should spend public money on saving these languages, While others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

There has been a controversy about whether endangered
languages
should be protected by the government. I think it's a waste of money, and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
First
, those
languages
are extremely difficult and strict. Take Latin as an example. It was the official
language
of the Roman empire.
However
,
this
language
is considered a dead
language
and only high-level educational institutions teach it nowadays. The reason is that the grammatical structure of
this
language
was too rigorous and complex that only high educational nobles could master it;
therefore
, it didn't prevail among the general public.
As a result
, due to the extinction of the Roman empire,
this
language
was gradually extincted as well. In
this
case, it would be an ill-advised decision certainly if the government planned to "resurrect"
this
language
.
Second
, endangered
languages
represent outmode. It has been reported that many Chinese dialects are in danger of extinction. I think it is not a bad thing because these dialects derived from poor transportation in ancient China. On account of terrible public transport, most people could only stay in the place where they were born;
hence
, my forefathers invented a local special
language
in order to give the local residents an identity.
Nevertheless
, because of developed transportation, people can go anywhere they want nowadays basically. At
this
point, dialects are considered the signs of isolation and under-development.
On the other hand
,
languages
are the witnesses of history; it's our responsibility to preserve our history and it's our duty to prevent them from being extinct. In
this
case, were the government to spend money on saving these endangered
languages
, it would be better. In conclusion, I believe the demerits of spending money on saving endangered
languages
outstrip their merits.
Submitted by junyiwu029 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: