Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Undoubtedly, the way of sharing

information

in academic space is a controversial issue these days.

Although

some

people

believe that it will be better if academic

data

sharing without giving

money

, others convince that if we consider some pivotal and invaluable content, it cannot be a good decision. from my standpoint, the opinion that restricts the accessibility to educational

information

is a bit naive. On the one hand, access to free content in academic space is argued by some

people

, and they believe that it is a quality way to transform

information

.

Firstly

, if

students

acquire their required

data

, it will support them to reach their goals as quickly as possible.

For example

, some sites have been designed for

this

aim

such

as Sci-Hub, where scholarly, under-graduated or graduated

students

can search the name of any article wanting through them;

therefore

, full articles appear straightforwardly.

Secondly

,

students

and

people

working in some businesses may not pay any

money

to receive

data

if there are no limitations in the availability of some guidance and textbooks. What’s more, the available

information

and the simple accessibility to them make a knock-on-effect in scientific advancement. To illustrate,

students

collect some reliable and accurate

data

and synthesize them; so, they can publish their research with high validation and stability.

On the other hand

, some

people

believe that

this

feature cannot be a good one, especially for rich and worthwhile

data

. As a matter of fact, when scholarly

people

made their best endeavours and work for a long time, it is possible that they had invested in

this

way excessively and desire to earn some

money

from that.

For example

, some articles that are submitted in non-open-access journals lead the

students

, along with their professors, to pay

money

for giving them. So, their preferences are completely different. To sum up, regarding the preceding remarks it can be stated that we have a huge gap between these two opinions in our academic world. in my opinion, it would be broadly better both for the

students

and the science if

data

were published without any limitations.