Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whether adolescents should do voluntary services in their association when they are free has caused a heated debate. Some

people

think these kinds of unpaid jobs are beneficial to both young

people

and society. My view, I partly agree with

this

viewpoint. It is definitely true that juveniles should do voluntary jobs in the place where they live.

This

is because working as volunteers can raise their social responsibility and train their social skills through having a realization of the

people

and life surrounding them.

As a result

, when they grow up, they can participate in society better and be a good citizen with good habits.

Furthermore

, the voluntary task has advantages to the construction of the public, which enhances the communication of neighbours and residents.

This

means that the public can obtain a sense of happiness and have a stable and peaceful life by working together.

For example

, they can organize residents to do the cleaning in the open area weekly, which leads to a better living environment for everyone. It is

also

true that community tasks should not be compulsory for juveniles but can be optional for them to choose from. If

this

service is compulsory and unpaid, it will decline the dynamic and vigour of young

people

, which cannot form a good cycle. In my viewpoint, youth can get social exercise and improve themselves through social services, which

also

develop the life level in the neighbourhood. Meanwhile, we should offer optional work which is better than compulsory and unpaid. In

this

way, we can actually develop both teenagers and the community to a preferable level, which is

also

beneficial to constructing a healthy and vigorous society.