Government should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
With the development of modern transportation, people think that countries should invest more bills in rail lines
instead
Linking Words
of highways and ridings. My view is that I partially agree with
this
Linking Words
opinion, and governments should develop both two transportations. It is clear that developing rail transport can reduce the pressure on the roads.
This
Linking Words
is because, due to the increasing numbers of personal vehicles, traffic jam and utilization of fossil fuels has become common.
As a result
Linking Words
, spending more cash on the construction of rails can enhance public transportation, protect the environment by decreasing air pollution and save oil resources.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, producing more high-speed trains can stimulate the economy in urban cities and rural areas by offering jobs to construction workers.
This
Linking Words
also
Linking Words
means that, when the trains are operated, people can travel alongside the rails which can bring business, trade, and develop tourism to make an economic contribution. More specifically, labour can leave undeveloped areas and be sent to developed places, where people can find occupations to get salaries. It is
also
Linking Words
true that governments will utilize more bills, labour, and time when building rail lines that will waste more resources rather than in ridings. In some poor and mountainous provinces, the situation there may be more suitable and easier to construct roads
instead
Linking Words
of tracks. In my view, countries should construct tracks to perfect the public traffic ways. Meanwhile, we cannot ignore the great investment and waste of resources used in lines. To develop the economy and make lives more convenient, governments should spend funds to build both these transportations in suitable places.
Submitted by 854136874 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainability
  • environmental footprint
  • efficiency
  • pollution
  • cost-effectiveness
  • economic development
  • accessibility
  • public transportation
  • congestion
  • air pollution
  • initial investment
  • maintenance
  • upgrades
  • rural
  • urban
  • last-mile connectivity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: