Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside. to what extend do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays,

traffic

and transport are big issues in every developing country. Many societies believe that the community should be motivated to stay in the city side

instead

of the countryside. It is beneficial to mitigate

this

hassle. I disagree with

this

statement. I will explain my points in a

further

paragraph.

To begin

with, urbanization can create more travel issues on the city side. These days, roads become too narrow due to big industries and buildings even though there are not enough parking spaces.

Hence

, the urban population can create more travel, issues in the future. Apart from that, the village public can create freight due to a lack of awareness. Numerous village folk are uneducated. They do not have proper knowledge and information about

traffic

rules and regulations

As a result

some communities may not get proper

transportation

facilities.

Moreover

, many populations prefer to use their own vehicles rather than

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

public vehicle. Because private are faster and more comfortable.

Also

, they do not like to share. Their vehicle with other people even if for the same destination.

Consequently

, there are chances to increase

traffic

conjunction in the future.

On the other hand

, urbanization is a great way if taxes are inclined.

transportation

funds may increase owing to the huge population, and it can be useful to enhance the

transportation

facilities to elevate

traffic

problems.

For instance

, the Delhi government made the metro train by the

transportation

budget. It becomes a productive step to decline

traffic

and

transportation

hassles. To conclude, I restate my opinion that urbanization is not a good way to solve

traffic

and

transportation

problems. There are many other ways to alleviate it.