Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Recently, there are arguments about the workplace of professionals

such

as doctors and engineers The proponents believe that they should serve the

country

where they were trained, and the opponents give the opinions that

people

have the right to choose where they want to develop their careers. The following essay is about both two points of view, followed by my thoughts that support the latter. The major reason why it is not good to force

people

in choosing workplaces is their homeland. Not every

country

can meet the professional training's obligations, leading to many

people

who want to receive higher education need to study abroad. In that circumstance, if these

people

were forced to stay abroad, their

countries

would easily encounter a brain drain problem. Afterwards, it is literally hard to predict the future development of these

countries

. In

this

modern society, white-collar workers play a truly essential role in

country

development, so it is unsatisfactory if experts are forced to serve somewhere else that differs from their own homeland. As long as the experts show their willingness to serve their

country

, it should be encouraged and supported.

On the other hand

, because of the differences between

countries

' faculties and training methods, there are

also

several obstacles for white-collar workers to deal with a workplace environment that distinguishes with the training one.

However

, with the recent developing globalized systems, overcoming the cultural battery is not that tough someday. In conclusion, despite many

people

saying the opposite, I think that it is necessary to allow professionals freely choose where they are willing to work. It is not only because of themselves but

also

for the sustainable development of their

countries

.