Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings. Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development, because this land would be better used for housing. Do you agree or disagree?

We can see that nowadays, many big cities have to deal with the lack of housing for residents. In order to solve

this

problem, some local authorities suppose that the area of

parks

should be removed to make room for residential growth. I am totally not convinced with

this

opinion.

This

essay will point out the reason why I disagree with it. The

first

reason is that

this

activity has adverse impacts on the life quality of city-dwellers.

First

, it can lead to health problems. Increasing the area of residents will result in the phenomenon of overpopulation which causes air and noise pollution.

Therefore

, citizens suffer from the consequences of respiratory diseases.

Moreover

, many citizens did not have the chance to use essential services. If a city has a huge number of

people

, it will put a burden on public infrastructures

such

as hospitals, schools, and

transportations

Fix the agreement mistake

transportation

show examples

, especially

parks

which are one of the main entertainment sites

of

Change preposition

for

show examples

people

.

For example

, Beijing has been suffering from overload due to having a lot of apartments, and

thus

many children do not have

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

room for

schools

Fix the agreement mistake

school

show examples

.

In addition

, reassigning

parks

is not a good solution to resolve the housing crisis. It means that the government should bring and carry out other policies

such

as encouraging

people

in cities to turn into the countryside.

For instance

, by attracting investments into the rural area, governments can contribute to creating more employment opportunities, so

people

will be motivated to move away from crowded cities. In conclusion, from my perspective, I fully disagree with the replacement of

parks

for the purpose of residents because of its negative effects on city-dwellers.

Moreover

, we have a lot of better ways to improve

this

phenomenon rather than demolish

parks

.

Finally

, the main responsibility of authorities is to seek a solution which ensures the quality of

people

’s

life

Replace the word

lives

show examples

as well as deal with

this

problem.