Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Folk

have various views about the endorsement of imaginative

artists

. A troop of them believe that any

supply

Replace the word

supplier

show examples

should be implemented by the government. Others,

however

, hold the view that

artists

such

as painters and musicians should be supported by other sources. I am in the same idea as the latter group. The

first

gang of

folk

think that the regime has to support

artists

to make progress in cultural situations.

This

improvement may result in increasing appropriate behaviours in society. Actions can lead to improving people's social agreements.

Artists

,

for example

, can do more art activities for the public, and activities are highly likely to make breakthroughs in public culture statutes.

Moreover

, the nation should pay attention to art and artist as they have not had a sufficient supply in recent years.

On the other hand

, the

second

band of

folk

believe that getting any help from the nation for art and its related topics tends to be inconvenient since

folk

's rights should be considered in the proper route. If the state's assistance should be accounted for facilities or economical projects which are based on the community. Namely, If private companies endorse

artists

, they are likely to acquire an acceptable boon, because

this

help may surely boost their income.

Artists

can be amazing when they get the right income,

therefore

they can make the best decision for themselves and their followers by means of an increase in the quality of their activities.

However

, some points

such

as tax gifts and borrowings for

such

companies should be considered by the government. In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that creative

artists

can be assisted and funded by private groups

instead

of the government.