In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
In some nations to have a permanent
house
is much more important than renting one. Living in a self-owned home brings a feeling of comfort and freedom. To my observation, this
is a practical trend which helps us have a long-term investment.
First
of all, people
probably design and decorate their homes according to their needs without depending on the house
owner. Besides
, each individual holding a house
does not worry about paying a monthly rent to a landlord. Therefore
, people
feel a sense of freedom to live their life. Along with this
, possessing a beautiful home help people
have lots of motivation to achieve other primary goals. For instance
, in India, the daughter’s parents cannot stand the sight of a son-in-law when he does not own a house
.
The final reason is that purchasing a house
is extremely vital for some citizens. Because they have a good shelter in bad weather, private, families with many generations living together. The real estate investment is wise and has a high profit. For example
, poor folk was living on feed, the poor were not allowed to make changes available furniture in the rental house
. Furthermore
, when you have your own home, you won't be interfered with by other people
and can arrange your facilities in your lifestyle without minding the house
-owner's permission.
To conclude, from my perspective, it is a positive circumstance to have a permanent residence which helps society invest in the future. However
, having a temporary house
is also
suitable for travellers and explorers.Submitted by daisyle1811 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.