In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

In some nations to have a permanent

house

is much more important than renting one. Living in a self-owned home brings a feeling of comfort and freedom. To my observation,

this

is a practical trend which helps us have a long-term investment.

First

of all,

people

probably design and decorate their homes according to their needs without depending on the

house

owner.

Besides

, each individual holding a

house

does not worry about paying a monthly rent to a landlord.

Therefore

,

people

feel a sense of freedom to live their life. Along with

this

, possessing a beautiful home help

people

have lots of motivation to achieve other primary goals.

For instance

, in India, the daughter’s parents cannot stand the sight of a son-in-law when he does not own a

house

. The final reason is that purchasing a

house

is extremely vital for some citizens. Because they have a good shelter in bad weather, private, families with many generations living together. The real estate investment is wise and has a high profit.

For example

, poor folk was living on feed, the poor were not allowed to make changes available furniture in the rental

house

.

Furthermore

, when you have your own home, you won't be interfered with by other

people

and can arrange your facilities in your lifestyle without minding the

house

-owner's permission. To conclude, from my perspective, it is a positive circumstance to have a permanent residence which helps society invest in the future.

However

, having a temporary

house

is

also

suitable for travellers and explorers.