Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. Which solution is better?

Rapid urbanisation has been a global phenomenon for a long, and
this
has caused a serious concern over housing expansion. Some cities have tackled
this
dilemma by constructing high-rise
buildings
whereas expanding the
area
for housing is what other cities adopt.
This
essay will discuss both perspectives on city development to evaluate which trend is better. On the one hand, establishing taller
buildings
can bring about certain benefits in terms of saving natural resources. Perhaps the best example of
this
would be Manhattan in New york city where a multitude of tall apartments has been constructed to meet the demand for decent accommodations for its citizens.
This
policy was introduced in 2019 when New York witnessed a considerable increase in its population and it perfectly solved the problem of land scarcity. I would argue that investing in constructing high-rise
buildings
is an effective long-term measure to cope with housing issues.
On the other hand
, building housing on a wider
area
of land can certainly offer a few merits. The obvious one is that people are provided with wider space which means that they can be able to relish better privacy and design their own houses in accordance with their preferences.
Therefore
, people will be able to invite their friends over to throw a party without disturbing their neighbours and they can have their own botanical gardens. Los Angeles,
for instance
, has been expanded
this
way, providing better living standards for its people. While expanding the
area
for housing has a few advantages, I believe that
this
solution is less effective than the aforementioned one in the long run. In conclusion, while both solutions prove their worth depends on the specific circumstances of different cities, establishing taller
buildings
is much better than expanding the
area
for housing in terms of sustainable city development.
Submitted by nhuminh031001 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban density
  • sustainability
  • public transportation
  • green spaces
  • community connections
  • overcrowding
  • economic implications
  • infrastructure impact
  • maintenance costs
  • carbon footprint
  • compact city
  • habitat destruction
  • greenhouse gas emissions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: