A group of people believe that smoking in the public should be banned. Other groups of people argue that it should not. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is often argued that smoking in public should be prohibited, while some think

otherwise

.

This

essay will explain both views before giving a conclusion. On the one hand, smoking in public ignores the right of non-smokers to inhale clean and fresh air.

Firstly

, smoking can

cause

harm to the smoker, as well, as to those who inhale it. Adults and children are most common highly affected by

this

kind of activity. It causes diseases in non-smokers like lung cancer and tuberculosis. Smoking in public

also

invites those individuals that stop smoking to engage in that kind of activity because of the smell it produces. It

also

causes annoyance to people that smell a foul odour that came from smoking.

In addition

, smoking can

cause

harm to the environment as well. It causes pollution to the area where there is the majority of people and sometimes once an individual has done smoking, they just throw the remains everywhere.

On the other hand

, Banning to

smoke

in public will

cause

outrage among those engaging in the activity. They will feel that they are suppressed by the government because their freedom to

smoke

in public places we're denied. Smoking is like an addiction to those uses. Some say that it is a way for them to relieve the stress and pressure that they experience in their daily life. Once a person engages in smoking, it is hard for them to stop. What's more, banning smoking in public will

cause

some businesses to deflate, like the tobacco sector, bars and pubs. In my opinion, smoking should be banned in public places with respect to people who don't

smoke

and those that stopped smoking.

Although

they should be provided with a private area in which they

smoke

freely, because, unfortunately, it is difficult for smokers to quit smoking just because the government said so.