There should be strict laws banning people from taking photographs of people under 18 in order to protect young celebrities and the children of celebrities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been argued that strict laws should be imposed to ban taking photographs of

children

of public figures or young celebrities who are under 18. Personally, I strongly support

this

idea for a number of reasons.

To begin

with, some people believe that taking photos of celebrities’

children

and the young who are famous can benefit them and

also

ordinary

children

. From their perspective,

this

group is likely to play a role model for their peers.

For example

, famous young athletes can motivate other

children

to be more physically active.

Moreover

, publishing photographs of new young celebrities may contribute to being seen by the public and gaining

reputation

Correct article usage

a reputation

show examples

. In spite of

this

, I hold the view that the photography of people under 18 should be forbidden since it seems to bring about serious problems for them.

Firstly

,

this

action indirectly conveys a message to

children

that they have to be always perfect in both appearance and conduct. While, it is possible for them in many cases to be immaculate

for instance

, sometimes they are bored and can not behave as an adult.

In addition

, as they are constantly judged by the public,

this

may mentally affect them. By way of example, paparazzi pages on Instagram share photographs or videos of

children

and sometimes criticise them that it can put a lot of tension on them and

consequently

causes many disorders

such

as depression or anxiety. In conclusion, I fully agree that laws should be imposed to prohibit taking pictures of famous youth under 18 who are popular in society because it is occasionally unbearable for them to act as an adult and can put them at high risk of developing different mental disorders.