In some countries, a few people earn extremely High salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The unprecedented progress in the earnings sector brings

along with

Linking Words

some notable notions which are incontrovertible. Among them, whether vastly giant salaries are applicable for the betterment of a nation or not is an undeniable propensity in

this

Linking Words

con-current

Correct your spelling

current

show examples

age . A bunch of personages assume that

this

Linking Words

is convenient for society;

whereas

Linking Words

, others argue that it should be limited by the responsible authority. In

this

Linking Words

discourse, I will explicate both stances on how it plays a pivotal role in an area and why it should be restricted in some cases, and

finally

Linking Words

, I will present my consensus by citing examples. On the one hand, the promoters of earning peak salary express their rationalization with conspicuous grounds. The standard way of living is one of them. The most important fact is that if

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

individuals can earn more money

according to

Linking Words

their job,

this

Linking Words

financial ability helps them to fulfil their all desires;

consequently

Linking Words

,

besides

Linking Words

, they can be able to invest their savings in another profitable section which can be the best example for others as motivation. Not only because of that but

also

Linking Words

through

this

Linking Words

way a positive probability can raise the gross domestic product (GDP).If the GDP

increase

Correct subject-verb agreement

increases

show examples

, it will undoubtedly bring a reputation from exotic countries. In the UK,

for instance

Linking Words

, there is no earning boundary, so all kinds of aforementioned aspects are fulfilled .

Thus

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

is the main concern why there should be no necessity for controlling salaries.

On the contrary

Linking Words

, another indispensable reason is culled out by other partisans with proffer plentiful logic. From these, the paramount nub is that decreasing the gap between rich and poor should be restricted by the governing authority. To reword

this

Linking Words

, if it is not limited, the people,who live below the poverty line, are prone to engage in crimes drastically which could

be created

Wrong verb form

create

show examples

another issue like implementing punishment costs .

This

Linking Words

is the fact why it ought to be curbed. Beyond that, despite having some concepts on behalf of control salaries, it should not be continued.

Instead

Linking Words

of these thoughts, rulers can swell up the taxes on various commodities and even more . When

government

Correct article usage

the government

show examples

enhance taxes for vast income and related other sectors, these can be fruitful for each and every situation in human well-being matters. In conclusion,To recapitulate, the

overall

Linking Words

picture from the discussion unravels the kernel of both views which have their own clarification. I am predisposed that high income should not be restricted and in lieu of

this

Linking Words

government can take

mentioned

Correct article usage

the mentioned

show examples

strategies to keep the thorough improvement of the

mass

Fix the agreement mistake

masses

show examples

.