The best way to solve world’s environment problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion.

With the increase in population and
Add a hyphen
ever-rising
show examples
ever rising
Add a hyphen
ever-rising
show examples
supply of non-renewable energy,
pollution emitting
Add a hyphen
pollution-emitting
show examples
fuels are the biggest threat to the environment. Some
people
suggest that charging more for
consumption
Correct article usage
the consumption
show examples
of
fuel
is the best solution to limit its effects. I disagree with the claim and the following essay provides evidence to support my position.
Firstly
, not all
fuel
production and consumption are disruptive to our habitat. There are
plethora
Add an article
a plethora
show examples
of renewable sources of energy which produce a great deal of
fuel
without
being
Unnecessary verb
apply
show examples
havoc on nature.
For instance
, the production of electricity by tidal and wind waves yields an insignificant amount of hazardous products, if not none. As another example, the sharp inclination of the masses towards the use of natural gas and electricity for cooking than the traditional ways of burning charcoal for
this
purpose already minimizes the damage done to the mama earth.
However
, taxing the use of traditional sources of energy that are unhealthy for our biosphere may encourage
people
to shift to improved alternatives for the same. But, since old methods are inconvenient and inefficient,
people
are naturally shifting to new ways.
For example
, most of the trains that were once based on
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
steam engines are now being powered by electric systems.
Hence
, the sheer ease that the new technology has to offer, facilitates
people
to adapt to the less environment-depleting choices. In conclusion, though the generation and consumption of some fuels might have a negative impact on the earth, it is not always the case. There is a trend to produce and consume non-hazardous
fuel
.
Hence
, in my opinion, making it expensive to access
fuel
is not the most effective strategy to conserve nature.
Instead
, it can be achieved by encouraging renewable sources.
Submitted by MUBZ32 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: