The best way to solve world’s environment problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion.

With the increase in population and

Add a hyphen

ever-rising

show examples

ever rising

Add a hyphen

ever-rising

show examples

supply of non-renewable energy,

pollution emitting

Add a hyphen

pollution-emitting

show examples

fuels are the biggest threat to the environment. Some

people

suggest that charging more for

consumption

Correct article usage

the consumption

show examples

of

fuel

is the best solution to limit its effects. I disagree with the claim and the following essay provides evidence to support my position.

Firstly

, not all

fuel

production and consumption are disruptive to our habitat. There are

plethora

Add an article

a plethora

show examples

of renewable sources of energy which produce a great deal of

fuel

without

being

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

havoc on nature.

For instance

, the production of electricity by tidal and wind waves yields an insignificant amount of hazardous products, if not none. As another example, the sharp inclination of the masses towards the use of natural gas and electricity for cooking than the traditional ways of burning charcoal for

this

purpose already minimizes the damage done to the mama earth.

However

, taxing the use of traditional sources of energy that are unhealthy for our biosphere may encourage

people

to shift to improved alternatives for the same. But, since old methods are inconvenient and inefficient,

people

are naturally shifting to new ways.

For example

, most of the trains that were once based on

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

steam engines are now being powered by electric systems.

Hence

, the sheer ease that the new technology has to offer, facilitates

people

to adapt to the less environment-depleting choices. In conclusion, though the generation and consumption of some fuels might have a negative impact on the earth, it is not always the case. There is a trend to produce and consume non-hazardous

fuel

.

Hence

, in my opinion, making it expensive to access

fuel

is not the most effective strategy to conserve nature.

Instead

, it can be achieved by encouraging renewable sources.