Some people think that air travel should be reduced to protect the environment. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Some people argue that there is a need for a restriction on flights, because of the air pollution and rising prices on fuel internationally, I disagree. In

this

essay, I will outline various benefits of travelling in breeze travel and reasons for my opposition. The

first

and foremost reason is that most public use travelling in a flight as a means of transport because

this

is one of the easiest ways to commute from one place to another.

For instance

, to deal with

agreement

Add an article

the agreement

show examples

of a business, or for any presentation, even students and families prefer

traveling

Change the spelling

travelling

show examples

in planes because

this

is the easiest way of transport.

Furthermore

, many countries depend financially on tourism, which really requires commuting by

airline

Add an article

the airline

show examples

. If there are any government restrictions on airways due to any environmental reasons, people would be disappointed most likely, it can have a negative impact on the global economy. As a conventional alternative, thousands of people would use the highways

instead

of railways due to unequal circumstances in geography. In conclusion, the government is able to create alternative travelling ways for short distances and support that idea in order that the amount of fuel oil usage overall can be reduced.

However

, any compulsory limitation in

this

matter would not replace flight journeys in long term.