Many people think that successful people’s accomplishments depend on the regions they come from, while other people think that it doesn’t matter where a person comes from, if that person has the will to succeed, he/she will triumph. What do you think?.

It has been widely thought that the career growth of an individual is positively related to their motherland, while on the other side it is viewed there is no relation between achievement & birth origin. I strongly believe in the latter due to effective reasons including technical skills and psychological factors. Studies conducted have proved that the success rate of various countries varies from time to time. Not a single country has ever held the flag of having the highest accomplishment rate. Annually research is carried out on an international level to explore the highest ranking in net wealth, which depicts successful individuals and not countries on the top list. It has been supported by the fact that millionaires' positions in the ranking may alter over the years. Technical exams attended by students from across the globe portrays individual expertise standing out with the least importance to their mother tongue, and highlight the hard work and perseverance one puts into their life. The above point is well backed up by various psychological research on

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

success that has significantly produced results that intrinsic motivation outweighs extrinsic factors. The motivation theory is well versed with the opinion that if an individual has innate skills to accomplish goals no other factors are potent enough to step them down their progress ladder. Intelligence and emotional quotient support a person's race towards goals. Despite some countries being categorised as developed and ,successful it has no relation to an individual's accomplishments. In ,fact organisations of various nations employ workers depending on the applicant's skill set without considering their country of origin.