Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disagree with
this
statement? Governments around the world have adopted different measures regarding which approach should be used to tackle traffic and congestion issues and improve public transformations. Some countries have spent more budget on building roads and expressways while some have more attention to public transportations like buses and trains. My opinion is quite aligned with the latter approach than the
first
. I will elaborate more on
this
topic in the following paragraphs. The most obvious consequence of having too many vehicles on the street is pollution. Especially how typical passenger cars emit CO2 and greenhouse gases which are toxic chemicals that can cause a lot of issues for humans and the environment as a whole.
For instance
, the PM 2.5 problem has been one of the most concerning environmental issues in Thailand for the past 5 years
also
being worsened by carbon emissions from passenger vehicles.
Moreover
, carbon emissions
also
help accelerated the severity of climate change which is the most imminent threat to humanity at the moment.
Therefore
, we must try to reduce the use of fossil fuels which are the source of energy for most passenger vehicles right now, and try to find more sustainable sources of energy
instead
. Most importantly, with how much technology in
transportation
has evolved over the
last
20 years. Building roads and streets are not a sign of a country’s greatness anymore. Most developed countries have abandoned that approach and spent money on improving public
transportation
. Good public
transportation
will help reduce traffic conditions and congestion in the city and allow people to live outside crowded metropolitan areas.
For example
, Japan has one of the best railroad systems in the world.
Hence
, even though most companies are located in the city areas, citizens who do not live near the cities can commute to work without the need to own a car.
Moreover
, Having good
transportation
is
also
positively correlated with economic’s prosperity since it helps distribute money and resource to other areas outside the cities. In conclusion, I believe that having good and reliable public
transportation
like buses and railroads should be one of the priorities for governments around the world because not just it is a more sustainable way of commute, but it
also
helps improve people’s life quality, generates economic value and helps on reducing inequality as well.
Submitted by prawuntipjaa on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: