In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of advertisements which try to persuade children to buy snacks, toys, and other goods. Parents often claim that these ads are unfair. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is claimed that children are bombarded by a plethora of

advertisements

that illustrate the tempting

goods

for youngsters like toys or snacks in different countries. It is declared by

parents

that these

advertisements

are not reasonable and acceptable. According to the

first

view, the purpose of these ads is for kids as they have the power to convince their

parents

by force to purchase

goods

that display on TV or anywhere else.

Moreover

, it causes to soar the purchase rate for that company.

For instance

, we know all kids and youngsters are enthusiastic about funny toys and junk as well.

Then

, once they encounter these

advertisements

which advertise and publicity these types of

goods

in a funny way due to stimulating the feeling they buy it, so they do anything that they can to obtain it like crying or nagging.

However

, in another view,

parents

protest against these ads as unappreciated ones. Indeed, the victim of these ads is

parents

eventually. It is clear that

parents

will be influenced by their children.

Consequently

, they have to buy

goods

to make them happy and calm. In fact, most of these

goods

like toys are useless and pricy.

Also

, I should point out the snacks as they are unsound. In conclusion, concerning raising the

advertisements

which target children to force their

parents

to purchase unsuitable stuff and unhealthy food. In my viewpoint, I completely agree with

parents

I can realize how it is tough to obey children’s words when they want non-functional stuff