Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that authorities should expend more financial resources on rail networks as compared to road construction.

This

essay agrees with

this

statement because it will reduce

air

pollution

and commute duration will reduce significantly.

Firstly

, when governments spend more on railways, it will help to curb

air

pollution

.

This

is because ,with better rail connectivity, more citizens will start using

trains

to

travel

.

As a result

, many cars will not run-on roads, and there will be less carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere. To illustrate, a recent study by Cambridge University found that if 20% of the community starts using

trains

to reach London from the suburbs, it will significantly reduce

air

pollution

as less number of cars will run on roads.

Secondly

, spending more money on railways will enhance rail-network connectivity, and

consequently

, it will reduce

travel

time

.

This

is because a large number of cars running on roads leads to traffic congestion. Due to

this

,

travel

time

increases significantly.

However

, in the case of travelling via train, there is no obstruction on railway lines and people can reach their destination in less

time

.

For example

, Japan has the best railway infrastructure and most people of Japan use

trains

to

travel

because

trains

can take passengers to their destination in minimum

time

. In conclusion, state authorities should spend more on the railway system because it will reduce

air

pollution

and

trains

will decrease travelling

time

.

Therefore

, it is predicted that governments will invest more money in strengthening the rail network.