Some people believe that it is good to share as much info as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Other, believe that some information in too important or valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give opinion

Globalisation eases the mobilisation around the globe, whether for living beings, machinery,

technology

, etc. Even though, at

this

point, people have different opinions and believe that scientific research, business and academic

knowledge

should have a precious value which cannot be shared without anything in return.

On the other hand

, others believe that it is a healthy practice to transfer

this

expertise to another

world

freely.

This

essay will discuss both views. On the

one

hand, people thought that it is always a good practice to share

technology

or information developed by

one

country with another which might be helpful for the

world

as a whole. Countries which are financially backward, will not be able to spend much of their resources on research related to science, commerce and the educational sector.

For instance

, The US developed GPS, using which

one

can use maps, trace locations of others and

also

help in Military operations.

However

, during the Indo-Pak war, India was not able to track the terrorist's position, at that point in time, the US deliver

such

a system to India and guided them to fight against the terrorist.

Furthermore

, findings related to the business and the academic

world

like the

technology

of recycling waste to minimise the pollution done by industries.

For example

, sharing of waste control

technology

by Russia with India, allows the latter to cope with the issues of pollution from industries.

Similarly

in the area of academics, to do experiments, there must have appropriate infrastructure and related

knowledge

. To illustrate, NASA is superior when it comes to studying planets, it constantly shares information with the

world

, in order to ensure that

this

knowledge

is used for educational purposes.

Hence

, countries should share as much info as possible in scientific research, business and the academic

world

, when it comes to the development of the

world

as a whole.

On the other hand

, those who are opposing it, believe that all

such

development and

knowledge

comes out after spending a huge amount of money, manpower and other resources. In order to stay motivated for future explorations, there should be something in return which could be rewarding for all the efforts made. During the COVID pandemic, Pfizer developed a vaccine for the deadliest disease, even though, medicine for that disease is crucial for everyone, the whole formula was only shared with adequate compensation.

Therefore

, in order for future development,

one

should get awarded for all the hard work they have put on for that work. In the conclusion, some experiments which do not have economical worth and which are crucial to humanity must have a Nord for free flow all over the

world

. In my opinion,

instead

of making all of them available at no cost, only those expertise needs to be shared which is prominent for humanity.