Introduction
It is argued that banning some specific information from media is more beneficial to citizens, while others disagree that giving the population freedom for getting any resource or pictures is more favourable. In
this
essay, I will Linking Words
further
explain both sides in detail in the ensuing paragraphs.Linking Words
Body paragraph 1
Firstly
, governments censor what the public sees or reads on the internet in some countries, in order to protect children from violent images. To a certain extent, censorship is necessary. Linking Words
For example
, some adolescents access pornography and violence through video games or the internet. In Linking Words
this
case, it would affect children's development in mental health and result in violent behaviours. Linking Words
Therefore
, there should be age limits for certain websites or computer games.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
However
, it is impossible for governments to control everything we see. Linking Words
For instance
, even though the internet is controlled, more and more people in China have found plenty of ways to escape the limit and attempt to break censorship. In Linking Words
this
case, these controlling would only get more negative feedback from the citizens. These indicate that it is better to teach kids how to search for appropriate knowledge by educating systems to the public and making a free society to browse those they are keen to.Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, they have a number of benefits to children for restricting information, and bringing more healthy mental growth;
however
, it does not entirely work to control any inappropriate content by the press or TV. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is highly suitable to provide the right concept from school Linking Words
instead
of censoring any strange information.Linking Words