In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Had fast
food
not existed, would many individuals overeating it in some lands have less
health issuesChange the quantifier
fewer
.
The problematic nature of the mentioned type of Change the punctuation
?
food
is being tried to be solved with policies like higher tax
rates for it. The latter can be viewed as vital or not looking at its benefits and drawbacks.
To embark on, raising the level of tax
for fast food
goods can be effective from some perspectives. Probably, a higher price would have a consequence of a lower figure of poorer members of society buying this
type of products
. Inevitably, it would become essential for those humans to start considering other choices for nurturing themselves. Choices Fix the agreement mistake
product
such
as fruits and vegetables, which are regarded as more healthy most times, might become increasingly attractive. Furthermore
, the dip of
quickly prepared Change preposition
in
food
consumption might lead to a plummeted calorie intake for many individuals. For this
reason, it is possible that not that many members of society would suffer from obesity, which is typically caused by overeating. Many other problems, for instance
, insufficient intake of vitamins, which in rapid time presented foods do not contain a lot, may be solved.
In spite of the described positive impacts, the outcome of a heightened tax
rate for in a quick time processed foods might also
be negative or without impact. Firstly
, it is possible that many may begin to start having mental health problems. In fact, tasty food
is well-known to release the happiness hormone dopamine, which triggers a rewarding feeling. Some might have not been advised how to deal with not experiencing this
emotion due to not being able to afford products
causing it. What is more, Correct article usage
the products
this
proposed solution would not affect the audience of the rich. They are able to afford what they want at almost any costs
, Fix the agreement mistake
cost
hence
, an adequate tax
upswing is predicted to impact this
group only very lightly.
This
allows Correct pronoun usage
us to
to conclude
that Change the verb form
concluding
although
the discussed idea of making the costs of fast food
go up, utilizing governmental tools, may seem an attractive one, it could be useful only to a limited extent. The emotional well-being of humans and the unaffected rich are elements that empower this
view. Hence
, these may be reasons why this
is not implemented fully in many places of the world and there is a reasonable ground for agreeing with them.Submitted by oimigle on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!