Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Air

pollution

has now become a global issue. While some are of the view that observing an international car-free

day

can reduce the effects of

air

pollution

.

On the contrary

, others believe that there are alternatives that could prove to be effective. In my opinion,

Although

, banning

cars

for a

day

can make a difference a

day

. Adopting other effective measures like introducing a fuel policy, electric

cars

and improvising on public transport can have a lasting effect on

this

growing concern. Supporters of the international car-free

day

believe that

cars

contribute to

air

pollution

by burning fossil fuels which emit harmful gases in the

air

, hazardous to nature and mankind.

For example

omission of

cars

for 24 hours can reduce the levels of carbon dioxide in the

air

.

On the other hand

, if a

day

of car banning can make a difference

then

we must look at better-prolonged options that could bring a change.

Hence

in my opinion, if the government adopts policies like levying taxes on fuel consumption and limiting the purchase of vehicles per family.

Secondly

, provide cheap and alternate public transport options.

For example

, introducing noodle pick-ups and drops to concentrated travel locations and introducing carpooling apps.

Thirdly

, introducing the use of electric

cars

thereby reducing the burden on the use of fossil fuels. To conclude, banning

cars

for a

day

can be an efficient method to adopt as a temporary solution. Other options like the introduction of electric

cars

, introducing fuel taxes & improving public transport methods can have a lasting effect on

air

pollution

thereby carving a pathway for a better future.