The restoration of old buildings in major cities around the world costs enormous amounts of money. This money would be better spent on providing new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, many people argue that government expand a sum of money on the renovation of antiquated construction in many megacities,,

however

Add a comma

,however

show examples

some people believe that the same quantity of bills must spend on assuming contemporary residences and highways advancement.From my point of view, the government must focus on both views. On the one hand, historical monuments are one of the key factors to initiate a country. ,

,

Change the punctuation

apply

show examples

Accordingly

Add a comma

,Accordingly

show examples

several ancient structures usually served as attractive landmarks for most tourists

moreover

these areas could be regarded as tourist spots and visitors' talking or meeting points. To illuminate, the Eiffel Tower in Paris is technically one of the 8 wonders of the world

hence

, most people would take advantage to travel to

this

well-known place, in order to explore various features and to experience various activities that

this

tower offers.

On the other hand

, state funds should be utilized for construction accommodations and avenues.It is undeniable that the government's notable responsibility is to society.

Thus

, lodging support ought to be presuming primarily to those who are in need.Meanwhile, continuous improvement of highways is

also

crucial, obviously,

this

will immensely boost a country's civilization and industrialization. In conclusion, having weight everything mentioned , I can come to the conclusion that it is necessary to restore the monuments constructed in the past and erect up-to-date modern apartments, and highways because they have their own value.